| Special Issue: Latin America Focus, February 2006 |
|
From the JPIC Office This week we bring you a special Latin America focus issue of the newsletter. From the U.S.-Mexico border to the tip of South America, there have been set-backs and surprises in the past few months. In Chile, the first female president was elected and in Bolivia, Evo Morales, an indigenous leader, was first-ever to be elected the the nation’s head of state. There is a wave of optimism among many in South America as with each new presidential election, the clamor for justice and new leadership by the people is heard. However, the situation on the U.S. - Mexico border continues to be tense as ever. We share with you reflections from missionaries who see first hand the triumphs and struggles lived by our sisters and brothers in Latin America.
Message From The Border First of all, many thanks to all of you who have supported the people on the mesa in Lomas de Poleo in their struggle for land and dignity against powerful and oppressive forces who continue to harass them. Your prayers, attention and visits and interventions of various kinds have been extremely helpful in letting the people know they are neither abandoned nor forgotten. As mentioned in a previous newsletter, the CIPOL (State Police) arrested Pedro Fuentes Zaragoza’s guards in October, and the people opened all the streets that had been sealed with cement posts and barbed wire. There was a sense of freedom and peace as people went about repairing their homes and going in and out without fear of being monitored and harassed by the guards. Not long after, however, the City of Juárez municipal government began to intervene. It was interesting, because we had been to the city’s offices many times in the past three years begging for some kind of intervention and the answer was always: “No, we have no authority to do anything because it is private property and we can’t enter.” Now, all of a sudden, with Zaragoza’s vigilantes out of the picture, the city comes in and tries to move the people off their land. The reubicacion (relocation) the city offered was rejected by almost everyone, not least of all because they figured the Juárez officials were simply coming in to do what the Zaragoza family had failed to do by using threats, violence, pulling out the electric posts, knocking down houses and even killing Luis Guererro. Now the city was going house to house trying, to convince people to sign away their rights to their land in return and to agree to move to a much smaller piece of land on the edge of the colonia. People who felt they had a constitutional right to their land and who had spent years building their homes and developing the land were adamant about not signing. At least four families, however, did sign to accept the relocation. They had given in to fear, veiled threats of eviction, and weariness in the struggle. In some cases, many believe, it took cash or bribes from the city to get them to accept the relocation. The people have attempted to get restraining orders (amparos) to stop the city’s intervention. There is an audience before a judge to hear testimony from the people and decide if the court will impede the city’s activity, but it is still uncertain. For the present the city officials have been driving around the mesa and if someone is building or even just enlarging their house, they are stopping them and saying they need permits from the city. Of course, when someone goes and applies, they are never given the permit! It is now clear that much of the motivation of the Zaragoza family and the city is the impending development in San Jernonimo and Santa Teresa. This plan has been pursued by very powerful interests in Mexico and New Mexico for more than 20 years. The main developer from Chihuahua, Eloy Vallina, is projected to gain $600 million in the sale and development of just 3,500 hectares of the 20,000 hectares he possesses. Unfortunately for Vallina, Lomas de Poleo is set in the middle of these plans and those who covert her ideal position near the border seem willing to do anything to get the remaining people out of the way. The Catholic Church in Juarez, many nongovernmental organizations, the media and even some business groups have come out in favor of a referendum to stop what is called Plan Parcial San Jeronimo and allow for an honest debate and analysis of the development and how it will affect the city’s future, the poor, the environment, water, etc. The people continue to animate me and strengthen my faith that God is present in their struggle. I am grateful for the tremendous knowledge I have learned about the lucha buena, about Mexico, about land rights, about faith and solidarity and networking while accompanying the people on the mesa. I am still very anxious about their future while convinced of the truth that someone said, “In the end, God wins!” Chile
From Chile on Election Day, the first woman President! “I was afraid that people would forget the dictatorship.” Gilda, a friend of mine, explained her relief and deep emotions at Michelle Bachelet’s election as the first woman president in Chile’s history. Gilda’s father, like Michelle’s, died at the hands of the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet (1973-1990), although the future presidenta’s father, an Air Force general, was also tortured before his execution. The reconciliation of different sectors of Chilean society is strongly symbolized by her election to the nation’s highest office. I was moved by the sight of younger people helping older people enter and leave the polling stations set up around Santiago, Chile’s capital of roughly 5 million people. There were wheelchairs waiting at the entrances, special rooms for the blind to vote, and a constant stream of men and women of all walks and stages of adult life, some with children in arms, others accompanied by their wives drawing up to the tables to show their identity cards, receive their ballots and a pencil, voting in small curtained booths, then returning to the table of four designated citizens to hand them the ballot, from which a numbered tag was removed and recorded. The voters signed their names in a voter registration book, received their ballots then deposited them in wooden boxes. The word Presidente is on each box—unlike a month ago, when another two boxes were labeled “Diputado” and “Senador,” (Congressperson and Senator). The voters’ thumbs are inked before they leave, an old tradition to prevent attempts at voting twice. Men and women vote in separate polling stations. I live in Providencia, the quaint but increasingly commercial township on the higher side of downtown—“higher” both topographically, being closer to the Andes mountain range, and in financial income, heading into the richer neighborhoods. Yet reorganization of the voting rolls in recent years obliges me to vote in Ñuñoa, several miles away on the grounds of the very college campus that I teach at during the academic year, one of several campuses of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Fr. Hugh McGonagle also votes there, living as I do at the Center House of the Columban Fathers in Chile. I celebrate Mass in the crowded working-class area of Quilicura, to the north of the city, and drive our congregation’s car straight to my voting station—through several traffic jams around other stations, set up at schools or sport complexes. Getting there takes almost an hour, and I park a half-mile away. But once I’ve reached the table of registrars and scrutineers for my group of voters, the whole process takes all of two minutes. Only two men are ahead of me. Voting is legally obligatory for all registered voters, and there are stories every election day of people arrested for not advising the police on time of their inability to vote, or to fulfill other requirements. The four registrants and scrutineers at each table, for instance, are chosen at random from the voting rolls, and those who fail to present a valid reason for not spending the entire day at the table and counting votes in this capacity are searched out and spend time in jail. The first arrivals at the tables are sometimes forced to take their places, so not many people want to arrive too early in the morning to vote. In the early years of this democracy, after independence from Spain in 1810, bakers would make empanadas, the traditional baked meat pies, for all those who voted, free of charge. The democratic spirit is still strong in Chile. I once visited the south of Chile and went with a friend to a local café in a town settled a century earlier by Germans and Swiss immigrants promised cheap land to farm, taken from the indigenous people of the area, the Mapuches. A young stranger joined us, an eager look in his eyes, and in the course of the conversation (we were still waist-deep in the moral swamp of General Augusto Pinochet’s iron-fisted rule) began to speak of the “cancer” of democracy spreading among the Chilean people. His idea of a prosperous future was shockingly close to fascism. It was the first time in my life that I actually heard anyone speak disparagingly of democracy as a danger to the public good. Sure, both Chileans and people from my own country complain about corrupt politicians, shaking their heads over the charlatans that get elected even to the highest seats of power. But a passion burned behind the efforts to rid the country of the dictator for 17 years. And what we enjoy now, as we walk through trimmed parks and under shady trees on a summer day to vote by the thousands feels like something sacred and noble. It feels like something we all achieved by recording in juridical detail the horrors of human rights abuses; by lighting bonfires in the streets on the nationwide nights of protest once a month; by learning to sit down on the streets when the water cannons directed their high-pressured spray at us, so as not to be knocked down; by watching bootlegged, foggy copies of “Missing,” “The Official Story” and even an uncensored “Doctor Zhivago” in small parish classrooms—by all these small but dangerous slaps at dictatorship. Today feels like a part of history. And we’ve taken a further step: we have today elected Chile’s first woman president, probably only the fourth in all of Latin America (after Bolivia, Nicaragua, Panama and Argentina). Michelle Bachelet, after exile and the execution of her father, eventually became the Minister of Defense in outgoing President Ricardo Lagos’ cabinet, achieving a smooth working relationship with the heads of the armed forces and police. She is a symbol of the prized civilian-military process of reconciliation and justice, incarnating the stabilized social process that ensures a certain level of economic prosperity for the country. The growing breach between rich and poor, however, continues to besmirch the present economic model, and Bachelet will have to effectively reduce the routines of selfishness in this model. After Sebastión Piñera, the millionaire, gave his concession speech, another Columban priest and I walk toward the city center, to observe as well as to celebrate Bachelet’s victory. We pass ever-increasing crowds of people who eventually take over both sides of the broad main avenue of Santiago. There is a vast field of colorful flags, many with the symbols of the coalition of parties that supported her as their candidate, and the air is festive. Cars and pickup trucks drive past, beeping, and loaded with banner-waving, clownish-hat-wearing, presidential-sash-bearing Bachelet supporters, as the summer sun sets. It’s not easy to get within sight of the stage from which Michelle will give her victory speech, with people crowded very close together, so eventually we walk back to the Center House and watch the speech on television, but the happiness all around us is contagious. We buy “Bachelet Presidente” banners to wave, we jump up and down at the lyrics of rhyming victory verses, and shake hands with old friends we see on the way, including other priests. My fellow Columban tells me his impressions of Bachelet’s competitor—the Columban priest is Chilean, and he felt that Piñera was like the snake-oil salesmen of the Old West—as we are pelted with confetti. Michelle’s speech is restrained, thanking her supporters for their vote, but insisting that she will be the president of all Chileans, including those who voted against her. She began by highlighting the dramatic significance of her election. “Who would have predicted this?” she asked. She noted the absence of her father—“I would like to have embraced my father, Alberto, warmly this evening” —and sounded the note of her future policies when she said, “Chile can have prosperity without losing its soul.”
She recognized the great achievements of her predecessor, President Ricardo Lagos, and noted that the day’s results are due to the state of equality in the country: “The vote of the humblest is worth the same as the vote of the richest.”
Peru
The people who pour daily into the shantytowns that surround Lima arrive with little money but a strong determination to improve their lives. In the second of our series of special reports, Isabel de Bertodano meets two Columban priests committed to helping them.
At a busy intersection in the upmarket area of San Isidro in central Lima .three lines of traffic are waiting impatiently for the lights to change, allowing them to speed south into the business district of the city. Few of the drivers waiting here are inclined to have much patience for a young boy underneath the traffic lights in the middle of the road. He is bouncing on the tarmac in front of the first three cars, performing handstands and cartwheels. It is a routine which is carefully timed so that the acrobat has a minute to impress with his gymnastics and then another 30 seconds to nip between the lines of waiting cars and knock on windows. He asks for a tip before sprinting to the safety of the central reservation just as the lights change. Bolivia
Morales and the Bolivian presidency: The following reflection was written by Fr. Eugene Toland, a Maryknoll priest who has served for many years in South America. He currently lives in Bolivia and watched the campaign, election and inauguration of President Evo Morales first-hand. If you could imagine that in the United States a coalition of Indian tribes, Afro-Americans, Hispanics, union organizations, some progressive business people, professionals and academics and senior citizens of all races and colors who need health care at some point formed a political party and, with an Indian chief as their presidential candidate, pulled off a sweeping victory to win the White House with a majority of voters perceiving it to be a party that would make needed radical changes and would be honest, you would have some idea of what it is like here on Bolivia [with] Evo Morales as president. Even more, if you imagined that the election victory was so sweeping that it wiped out both the Democratic and Republican parties and left the winning party and another new party made up of transfers from the two traditional parties to fill the congressional seats of both houses you would have an even better sense of what has happened here. Evo Morales and his political party, Movement towards Socialism (MAS), swept to victory on December 18 and now will control both houses of the Congress as well as the presidency. The MAS won the lower house with a majority and has now gained the support of two senators from smaller parties to control the senate.
Rise in popularity The purpose of the visits was to show, contrary to opinions before the election that with a MAS victory Bolivia would not be isolated by the international community. Likewise the trips served to have Evo assure world leaders that Bolivia would abide by international agreements, its own laws, and respect private property. Finally, during the visits he asked advice from seasoned leaders of governments on how he might govern effectively as president. He did not go to ask for assistance but in the end most countries offered to provide financial and technical assistance to further the new government’s programs. As he returned to Bolivia opinion polls in the country showed he had a 65 percent approval rating. There was some controversy during the trip: Evo did not don a suit and tie even when he visited the King of Spain! That provoked a few negative editorial remarks in the world press that were responded to by editorials in Bolivia pointing out that the clothes do not make the man but rather his ideas and actions. Besides, some argued it might be time for a change in the established European western standard for what makes for a well dressed leader! Open collar is certainly more comfortable than a tie introduced into western society in 1660 by a Croatian regiment presenting itself to King Louis XVI.
Gas prices While Evo has been on the road his vice president, Alvaro García Linera, a former guerrilla who served some time in prison and later became a respected sociologist, and other members of the MAS team have been busy with the transition which has gone smoothly with the pro-active cooperation of current interim President Eduardo Rodríguez, the chief justice who assumed office due to the constitutional crisis last June. Evo and his team have indicated that they will begin on day one to implement their program that was mandated by the overwhelming vote in December.
Changes on the way Evo announced that there will also be a change in how the executive branch operates with elimination of some cabinet offices and introduction of others. For instance the departments for Indian affairs and for women will be eliminated since both groups will have ample representation in the cabinet and government. Evo joked that someone had suggested to him that his strongly indigenous government introduce a department for K’aras, the Aymara word for “white folk.” He did want to set up a Ministry of Sports and Culture (being an ardent soccer player himself), but there is no money in the budget for that this year.
U.S. don’t push Reflecting an attitude of many, one member of the MAS transition team has said that the new government will end the long term interference of the U.S. government in the affairs of the Bolivian state removing what he referred to as a type of U.S. “hacienda” in the Quemado (Bolivian White House). However Evo has indicated that he is open to respectful relationships with all countries including the U.S. and, as is usual the case, the pre-campaign rhetoric has been toned down to a mature diplomatic discourse. While the U.S. government has been cautious in its acknowledgement of the MAS victory it recognizes that with Evo’s overwhelming electoral mandate it has no choice but to deal respectfully with this new government as with the other center-left governments elected recently in the continent. It is a wave that deserves a longer commentary later. Most commentators recognize that with this election the country is at a critical juncture in its history with many of the recurring challenges of the past but with historic hopeful opportunities. The new government faces challenges of extreme poverty, wide gaps in distribution of wealth, attitudes of passivity and dependence on patrons, deep rooted corruption in government, the need to rewrite the constitution, provide a fair income from the country’s gas deposits, the call for local autonomy in various regions of the country, and how to resolve the production of coca in face of U.S. demands. There will be pressures from below and from the big powerful interests within and outside the country. Yet the opportunities are there with a economy that has shown signs of growth especially with agricultural and gas exports, and a wide sense among the population that it is time to work together to make major changes, including developing a culture of values that draw on ancient Andean “commandments”- “do not rob, do not lie, do not be lazy” and that promote solidarity for the benefit of the common good. Clearly with an uncertain future we can only hope for the best for this poor country, but as well commit ourselves to lend what hand we can to help it grow into the nation its resilient people so well deserve. Contact Us
We welcome submissions, comments and suggestions.
|